Global Market Data
Global News Journal
Pakistan: Now or Never?
Front Row Washington
The Great Debate
Personal Finance Video
Life & Culture
A selection of our top photos from the past 24 hours. Full Article
Argentina's Fernandez hand strengthened by primary
15 Aug 2011
Amoeba blamed for swimming death in Florida
15 Aug 2011
Gaddafi forces fire Scud missile: U.S. official
Wall Street slips as weak German data renews concerns
High pressure on Sarkozy-Merkel euro zone talks
Appeals court rules against Obama healthcare law
Stop coddling the super-rich: Buffett
Most Americans believe U.S. on wrong track: Reuters/Ipsos poll
Taking off for Russia's airshow.
Sat, Aug 13 2011
Breakingviews: Motorola a win for Google, concern for others
Mon, Aug 15 2011
Defiance and doubts in Tripoli
Mon, Aug 15 2011
Iraq's bloodiest day revives al Qaeda fears
Syrian tanks shell Latakia, death toll reaches 34
Arab drama stirs sectarian debate in Iraq
Bombs, attacks hit Iraqi cities, at least 60 dead
Mon, Aug 15 2011
Algerian suicide attack wounds 29
Sun, Aug 14 2011
Tank, navy attack on Syria's Latakia kills 26: witnesses
Sun, Aug 14 2011
Analysis & Opinion
Land seizures in China’s Kashgar fuel anger among Muslim Uighurs
Guns return to Belfast murals amid rising Catholic-Protestant tensions
By Patrick Markey
Tue Aug 16, 2011 10:55am EDT
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's bloodiest day this year delivered a deadly reminder to the government and departing U.S. troops that al Qaeda affiliates can still stage complex, coordinated attacks and test security forces with widespread destruction.
Suicide bombers, car bombs and roadside explosives hit more than a dozen Iraqi cities and towns on Monday, killing around 70 people in resurgent violence just five months before U.S. troops are scheduled to withdraw.
The apparently coordinated attacks shattered the calm of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, and were the deadliest since March when suicide bombers and gunmen killed more than 50 people in an attack on a provincial government building in Tikrit.
In Monday's most deadly attack, two bombs killed at least 37 people in the mainly Shi'ite Muslim city of Kut. But other assaults included a suicide bomber attack on a prison holding al Qaeda inmates in Tikrit, and another suicide bomb on a provincial government building, killing eight north of Baghdad.
No group has claimed responsibility for the wave of attacks in both Sunni and Shi'ite areas, but authorities blamed the al Qaeda affiliate, the Sunni Islamist Islamic State of Iraq (ISI).
Security experts said the scope of the attacks illustrated the insurgency's resilience, but said one bloody day did not signal the revival of the type of sustained campaign insurgents carried out at the height of sectarian slaughter in 2006-07.
"This seems to be a reversion to their old style where they try to carry out multiple attacks to put out a message that they are not a spent force," said Jeremy Binnie at Jane's Terrorism and Security Monitor.
"But they are becoming more sporadic. This doesn't necessarily point to a worrying deterioration in security in Iraq over the long term."
Despite the loss of key commanders and territory where it can operate, ISI has staged high-profile attacks on security forces to undermine confidence in their ability to protect Iraqis -- more than eight years after the U.S. invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.
In October last year, gunmen seized hostages during Sunday mass at Baghdad church. Around 52 hostages and police were killed in the incident. Al Qaeda's claimed the attack on "the dirty den of idolatry."
Al Qaeda gunman attacked a provincial council headquarters in Tikrit in March, taking hostages before security forces stormed the building. At least 53 people were killed.
U.S. and Iraqi officials say Iraq's military can contain internal threats. But many Iraqis privately fear their security forces are not ready and the country may slide back into general violence without the buffer of U.S. troops on the ground.
"Al Qaeda's fingerprints are all over this. Security authorities in the province should be blamed, because they failed in their duties," Mehdi al-Moussawi, deputy head of Kut provincial council, said after the attacks there.
"Our security forces deserve to be called a failure."
Iraqi and U.S. officials say they expect more attacks as the deadline for American troops draws near, likely further testing nerves in Baghdad and Washington as they discuss whether U.S. troops stay on as military trainers.
American soldiers staying on Iraqi soil is a sensitive issue, and further large-scale violence will pressure Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's fragile coalition of Sunnis, Shi'ites and Kurds as they debate the U.S. troop presence.
"Ironically these attacks... give credence to those that argue that Iraqi security forces still need American assistance -- rather than push the Iraqi government to decide on an early withdrawal," said Gala Riani of IHS Global Insight.
"Perhaps at the end of the day it is not so ironic since arguably militants - despite their stated loathing of foreign troops - need a degree of foreign presence to retain their ideological vigor."
Washington ended combat missions in Iraq in August last year. U.S. troops are now engaged only in training, advising and assisting Iraqi forces though they still conduct counter-terrorism operations with local Iraqi military.
Al Qaeda is not the only threat -- rival Shi'ite militias have also tried to step up attacks on U.S. troops, mainly in the south of Iraq, where U.S. officials say Iran has helped militants.
June was the deadliest month in two years for American soldiers in Iraq with 14 deaths, most blamed on rocket attacks by Shi'ite militias.
U.S. officials say since then attacks have dropped off, but that they were still in "wait and see" mode on whether assaults would rise again as the troop drawdown begins.
Anti-U.S. Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, whose militia once fought American troops and who is now a mainstream Maliki ally, has already made his position clear earlier this month.
"Whoever stays in Iraq will be treated as an unjust invader," he wrote in a missive, "and should be opposed with military resistance."
(Additional reporting by Rania El Gamal and Ahmed Rasheed; Editing by Mark Heinrich)
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Be the first to comment on reuters.com.
Add yours using the box above.
Social Stream (What's this?)
Back to top
New York Legal
Support & Contact
Advertise With Us
Connect with Reuters
Our Flagship financial information platform incorporating Reuters Insider
An ultra-low latency infrastructure for electric trading and data distribution
A connected approach to governance, risk and compliance
Our next generation legal research platform
Our global tax workstation
About Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.