The Freeland File
Global Market Data
Tales from the Trail
Lucy P. Marcus
David Cay Johnston
The Great Debate
Jack & Suzy Welch
Macro & Markets
Lipper Awards 2012
Personal Finance Video
Barclays CEO Diamond quits over rate rigging
Actor Andy Griffith dies in North Carolina
Iran says it test-fires missiles in war of nerves
Scorching heat roasts eastern United States
Syrian army attacks rebels, Turkey scrambles F16s
Supreme Court to deliver Obama healthcare law ruling
Insight: ”Green Fleet” sails, meets stiff headwinds in Congress
Iran threatens Israel; new EU sanctions take force
U.S. Morning Call: Microsoft computes a $6.2 bln hit
3XSQ: Microsoft mistake, Chrysler gains
Who'll replace Bob Diamond?
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Raging fires strike Colorado and Utah. Slideshow
Gay Pride parades
Revelers celebrate Gay Pride month with parades all around the world. Slideshow
Intel fights $1.3 billion EU antitrust fine in court
EU says Universal, EMI deal hits competition: sources
Google offers to settle EU antitrust probe
Mon, Jul 2 2012
U.S. court rules against FCC in TV profanity, nudity cases
Thu, Jun 21 2012
EU to rule on Siemens, Areva probe next week
Fri, Jun 15 2012
Insight: Google goes softly-softly on European antitrust
Mon, Jun 11 2012
Analysis & Opinion
Do women hold the key to having it all?
SCOTUS: What Congress can’t regulate, it can tax
A woman walks past an Intel logo at the 2012 Computex in Taipei June 5, 2012. Computex, the world's second largest consumer electronics trade fair, runs from June 5 to 9.
Credit: Reuters/Yi-ting Chung
By Foo Yun Chee
Tue Jul 3, 2012 10:23am EDT
LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - EU antitrust regulators relied on "profoundly inadequate" evidence in their case against Intel, the U.S. chipmaker said in court on Tuesday in a bid to quash a record 1.06 billion euro ($1.33 billion) fine.
The European Commission penalised the world's No.1 chipmaker three years ago for hindering arch-rival Advanced Micro Devices, after an eight-year investigation.
The fine, which represented 4.15 percent of Intel's 2008 turnover versus a possible maximum of 10 percent, was the biggest ever levied on a company.
A panel of five judges at the General Court in Luxembourg, Europe's second highest, will hear arguments from both the EU watchdog and Intel during the four-day hearing, in which the company wants its conviction and fine thrown out or reduced.
The Commission did not have sufficient evidence of any wrongdoing by Intel and relied too much on subjective comments by the company's customers, Intel's lawyer Nicholas Green told the court.
"The quality of evidence relied on by the Commission is profoundly inadequate. The analysis is hopelessly and irretrievably defective," he said.
"The Commission's case turns on what customers' subjective understanding is," Green said.
U.S. No.2 PC maker Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co, Japan's NEC, world No.2 PC maker Lenovo and German retail chain Media Saturn Holding received rebates from Intel during the period investigated by the regulator.
Lawyers for the Commission said this was at the core of Intel's illegal business practice.
"These kind of rebates can only be intended to tie customers and put competitors in an unfavourable position," Commission lawyer Nicholas Khan told judges.
He said contract wording also showed that "Intel carefully camouflaged its anti-competitive practices".
Intel gained backing from the European Ombudsman, who censured the Commission for procedural errors in its investigation.
In his non-binding report issued five months after the regulatory finding, the Ombudsman said he had found "maladministration" because the regulator had failed to make a proper note of a meeting with Dell during its probe.
The Association for Competitive Technology, a lobby group representing more than 3,000 small software developers and information technology firms, supported Intel.
French consumer organisation Que choisir is backing the Commission's position.
The General Court is expected to rule in the coming months. Companies can appeal to the highest court, the EU Court of Justice, if they take their case further.
The case is T-286/09, Intel vs Commission.
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Rex Merrifield and Mark Potter)
Related Quotes and News
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Be the first to comment on reuters.com.
Add yours using the box above.
Back to top
New York Legal
Support & Contact
Connect with Reuters
Our Flagship financial information platform incorporating Reuters Insider
An ultra-low latency infrastructure for electronic trading and data distribution
A connected approach to governance, risk and compliance
Our next generation legal research platform
Our global tax workstation
About Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.