Pakistanis angry over detentions in Times Sq. case Monday, May 24, 2010
ISLAMABAD – Relatives of three men detained by Pakistan for alleged links to the suspect in the attempted Times Square bombing say the men are innocent.
They
AFP - Thursday, August 6TAIPEI (AFP) - - Taiwan's Beijing-friendly government on Wednesday denied boycotting an Australian film festival amid a row over the e
BERLIN (Reuters) - Chancellor Angela Merkel suffered a double blow on Thursday as a senior party ally in east German
Minister seeks closure of anti-Berlusconi websites Wednesday, December 16, 2009
ROME (AFP) - – The Italian government moved Tuesday to close down Internet sites encouraging further violence against Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who
By ELAINE KURTENBACH,AP Business Writer AP - Wednesday, March 18SHANGHAI - Asia's stock market rally seemed to be running out of steam Wednesday, despite an
My Profile
Live Election Coverage
Breaking news, state-by-state map and more...
Election News
You are here:
Home
>
News
>
Entertainment
>
Article
Home
Business & Finance
News
U.S.
Politics
International
Technology
Entertainment
Film
Music
People
Television
Arts
Industry
Sports
Lifestyle
Oddly Enough
Environment
Health
Science
Special Coverage
Video
Pictures
You Witness
The Great Debate
Blogs
Reader Feedback
Do More With Reuters
RSS
Widgets
Mobile
Podcasts
Newsletters
You Witness News
Make Reuters My Homepage
Partner Services
CareerBuilder
Affiliate Network
Professional Products
Support (Customer Zone)
Reuters Media
Financial Products
About Thomson Reuters
Top court considers television dirty words case
Tue Nov 4, 2008 2:36pm EST
Email | Print |
Share
| Reprints | Single Page
[-]
Text
[+]
By James Vicini
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Supreme Court appeared divided on Tuesday over a U.S. government crackdown on dirty words on television as the justices carefully avoided uttering the two four-letter expletives at the heart of the case.
In considering the policy that subjects broadcasters to fines for airing a single expletive blurted out on a live television show, the justices and the lawyers who argued the case instead referred to the "F word" and the "S word."
Several liberal justices seemed concerned over how broadcasters could prevent dirty words from being aired at live events like sports contests and whether the words might have other meanings beyond sexual or excretory connotations.
Some of the conservative justices appeared supportive of the crackdown adopted by the Federal Communications Commission against the one-time use of profanity on live television when children are likely to be watching.
The Supreme Court during the 60 minutes of arguments reviewed broadcast indecency standards for the first time in 30 years. A ruling is expected in the first part of next year.
The case stemmed from a FCC ruling in 2006 that found News Corp's Fox television network violated decency rules when singer Cher blurted out an expletive during the 2002 Billboard Music Awards broadcast and actress Nicole Richie used two during the 2003 awards.
No fines were imposed, but Fox challenged the decision and a U.S. appeals court in New York struck down the new policy as "arbitrary and capricious" and sent the case back to the FCC for a more reasoned explanation of its policy.
The FCC, under the administration of President George W. Bush, has embarked on a crackdown of indecent content on broadcast TV and radio after pop star Janet Jackson briefly exposed her bare breast during the 2004 broadcast of the Super Bowl halftime show.
Before 2004, the FCC did not ordinarily enforce prohibitions against indecency unless there were repeated occurrences.
Liberal Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg seemed the most critical of the FCC's new policy.
WHAT ABOUT DUNG?
Stevens asked the government's lawyer whether the word "dung" could use considered indecent and he questioned whether an expletive might be used in a way that has no sexual connotation whatsoever.
Justice Ginsburg said there "seems to be no rhyme or reason" for some of the FCC's decisions. She said the agency allowed the television broadcast of the movie "Saving Private Ryan" even though it contained the same expletives.
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Antonin Scalia, both conservatives, seemed most supportive of the government's policy.
Scalia blamed television shows for coarsening the language and said he sees nothing wrong with cracking down on bad words on television. Continued...
View article on single page
Share:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Mixx
My Web
Facebook
LinkedIn
Next Article:
TV shows may see post-election ratings growth
Also on Reuters
Election Coverage 2008: Tracking the lastest news
The Great Debate: Discussing the big issues of the day
Blog: Peering through funnels at interfaith problems
Editor's Choice
Pictures
Video
Articles
Slideshow
A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours. Slideshow
penguins
Kenya, Obama
Robot surgery
Health: Surgeon of the future in theatres now
Top News: Hope in Obama's ancestral Kenya village
Lifestyle: Young king to wear Bhutan's crown
Most Popular on Reuters
Articles
Video
Recommended
SCENARIOS: How Obama, McCain are faring in key states
Networks may call election before some polls close
Obama mourns grandmother on election eve
Obama leads McCain in 5 of 8 key states | Video
Frozen mice cloned - are woolly mammoths next?
Obama and McCain await voters' decision
Obama and McCain await voters' decision | Video
Obama Democrats head toward big congressional wins
Clues to election result could come early | Video
Rare flash of anger from Obama on Halloween night
Most Popular Articles RSS Feed
Video
Obama's grandmother dies
Dixville Notch kicks off U.S. voting
First stop for Petraeus: Pakistan
Many unknowns before election day
Prank call catches Palin off guard
Voters take to the polls
Candidates make their final push
Protest over Bali bombers' execution
McCain supporters remain upbeat
Issues surface in early voting
Most Popular Videos RSS Feed
Live Coverage of Election Night, 2008
Breaking news headlines
Interactive state-by-state map
Tales from the Trail blog
Reuters/Zogby tracking polls
Reuters.com:
Help and Contact Us |
Advertise With Us |
Mobile |
Newsletters |
RSS |
Interactive TV |
Labs |
Reuters in Second Life |
Archive |
Site Index |
Video Index
Thomson Reuters Corporate:
Copyright |
Disclaimer |
Privacy |
Professional Products |
Professional Products Support |
About Thomson Reuters |
Careers
International Editions:
Africa |
Arabic |
Argentina |
Brazil |
Canada |
China |
France |
Germany |
India |
Italy |
Japan |
Latin America |
Mexico |
Russia |
Spain |
United Kingdom |
United States
Thomson Reuters is the world's largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.